The collapse of the Soviet Union suddenly rendered ethnic Russians living in non-Russian successor states like Latvia and Kyrgyzstan new minorities subject to dramatic political, economic, and social upheaval. As elites in these new states implemented formal policies and condoned informal practices that privileged non-Russians, ethnic Russians had to react. In Russian Minority Politics in Post-Soviet Latvia and Kyrgyzstan, Michele E. Commercio draws on extensive field research, including hundreds of personal interviews, to analyze the responses of minority Russians to such policies and practices. In particular, she focuses on the role played by formal and informal institutions in the crystallization of Russian attitudes, preferences, and behaviors in these states.
Commercio asks why there is more out-migration and less political mobilization among Russians in Kyrgyzstan, a state that adopts policies that placate both Kyrgyz and Russians, and less out-migration and more political mobilization among Russians in Latvia, a state that adopts policies that favor Latvians at the expense of Russians. Challenging current thinking, she suggests that the answer to this question lies in the power of informal networks.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Communist party, Komsomol youth organization, and KGB networks were transformed into informal networks. Russians in Kyrgyzstan were for various reasons isolated from such networks, and this isolation restricted their access to the country’s private sector, making it difficult for them to create effective associations capable of representing their interests. This resulted in a high level of Russian exit and the silencing of Russian voices. In contrast, Russians in Latvia were well connected to such networks, which provided them with access to the country’s private sector and facilitated the establishment of political parties and nongovernmental organizations that represented their interests. This led to a low level of Russian exit and high level of Russian voice. Commercio concludes that informal networks have a stronger influence on minority politics than formal institutions.
Uncover the intricate dynamics of ethnic Russian minority politics in the wake of the Soviet Union's dissolution with Michele E. Commercio's groundbreaking study, *Russian Minority Politics in Post-Soviet Latvia and Kyrgyzstan: The Transformative Power of Informal Networks*. This meticulously researched hardcover edition, part of the "National and Ethnic Conflict in the 21st Century" series from the University of Pennsylvania Press, delves into the diverse experiences of Russians left stranded in newly independent Latvia and Kyrgyzstan. Commercio goes beyond surface-level observations, exploring the profound impact of political, economic, and social shifts on these communities. Using extensive fieldwork, including hundreds of revealing personal interviews, she analyzes the responses of ethnic Russians to policies and practices that often favored the titular nationalities. The book investigates the crystallization of Russian attitudes, preferences, and behaviors, placing special emphasis on the crucial role of formal and, most importantly, informal institutions. Why did Kyrgyzstan see more out-migration and less political engagement among its Russian population, while Latvia experienced the opposite trend lower emigration and heightened political activism? Commercio challenges conventional wisdom, arguing that the answer lies in the enduring power of informal networks, specifically the remnants of Soviet-era structures. Contrary to the conventional wisdom that focuses solely on formal institutions, Commercio argues that the informal networks stemming from the Communist Party, Komsomol, and even the KGB, played a decisive, though often unseen, role. In Kyrgyzstan, Russians found themselves largely excluded from these crucial networks, limiting their access to the burgeoning private sector and hindering their ability to form effective organizations to advocate for their interests. This isolation fueled emigration and silenced their voices in the political sphere. In Latvia, however, the situation was starkly different. Russians maintained strong ties to these informal networks, which provided them with access to economic opportunities and facilitated the creation of political parties and NGOs. This allowed them to effectively represent their interests, leading to greater political participation and a lower rate of emigration. Commercio's research highlights the resilience and adaptability of these informal structures and their enduring influence on minority politics. By focusing on the social networks that either empowered or marginalized ethnic Russians, she sheds new light on the complexities of post-Soviet nation-building and the enduring legacies of the Soviet era. This illustrated edition, published in 2010, offers invaluable insights into the dynamics of ethnic relations, nationalism, and social networks in Latvia and Kyrgyzstan. It is a must-read for scholars and policymakers interested in post-Soviet studies, ethnic conflict, and the role of informal institutions in shaping political outcomes. Discover how these hidden networks continue to shape national identities and political landscapes in the 21st century. This book, comprising 248 pages, offers an in-depth analysis and is weighted at 544g.