In the contentious debate among contemporary epistemologists and philosophers regarding justification, there is one consensus: justification is distinct from knowledge; there are justified beliefs that do not amount to knowledge, even if all instances of knowledge are instances of justified belief. In Without Justification, Jonathan Sutton forcefully opposes this claim. He proposes instead that justified belief simply is knowledge — not because there is more knowledge than has been supposed, but because there are fewer justified beliefs. There are, he argues, no false justified beliefs.
Sutton suggests that the distinction between justified belief and knowledge is drawn only in contemporary epistemology, and suggests furter that classic philosophers of both ancient and modern times would not have questioned the idea that justification is identical to knowledge.
Sutton argues both that we do not (perhaps even cannot) have a serviceable notion of justification that is distinct from knowledge and that we do not need one. We can get by better in epistemology, he writes, without it. Sutton explores the topics of testimony and evidence, and proposes an account of these two key epistemological topics that relies on the notion of knowledge alone. He also addresses inference (both deductive and inductive), internalism versus externalism in epistemology, functionalism, the paradox of the preface, and the lottery paradox. Sutton argues that all of us–philosopher and nonphilosopher alike–should stick to what we know; we should believe something only if we know it to be so. Further, we should not believe what someone tells us unless we know that he knows what he is talking about. These views are radical, he argues, only in the context of contemporary epistemology’s ill-founded distinction between knowledge and justification.
Dive into a radical re-evaluation of knowledge and belief with Jonathan Sutton's groundbreaking book, *Without Justification (MIT Press)*. This New Edition challenges a fundamental assumption in contemporary epistemology: that justification and knowledge are distinct entities. Sutton boldly argues that justified belief *is* knowledge, not through an expansion of what constitutes knowledge, but rather through a rigorous reduction of what qualifies as justified belief. Prepare to question long-held assumptions as Sutton dismantles the prevailing view, asserting that false justified beliefs simply do not exist. Sutton meticulously constructs his case, suggesting the modern distinction between justified belief and knowledge is a recent invention, alien to the classical philosophical tradition. He invites readers to reconsider the wisdom of ancient and modern thinkers who implicitly equated justification with knowledge itself. This is not merely an academic exercise; Sutton contends that our current reliance on a separate notion of justification is not only unnecessary but actively hinders our understanding of epistemology. *Without Justification* proposes a leaner, more robust epistemological framework centered on knowledge alone. Sutton delves into critical areas such as testimony and evidence, offering fresh perspectives rooted in the concept of knowledge. He tackles complex subjects including deductive and inductive inference, the internalism/externalism debate, functionalism, and notorious paradoxes like the preface and lottery paradoxes, providing compelling arguments for his radical stance. Sutton doesn't shy away from challenging established philosophical norms, offering a refreshing perspective on these intricate issues. This book isn't just for seasoned philosophers; it's a call to action for anyone grappling with questions of truth and belief. Sutton implores readers, both philosopher and layperson, to embrace a more grounded approach: believe only what you know to be true and accept testimony only from those you know possess genuine knowledge. While seemingly radical in the context of contemporary epistemology's established norms, Sutton argues that these principles are, in reality, intuitive and reflect a more natural way of engaging with the world. *Without Justification* provides a compelling and thought-provoking journey through the landscape of epistemology, offering a provocative thesis that is sure to spark debate and reshape your understanding of knowledge, belief, and the pursuit of truth. A must-read for anyone interested in challenging conventional wisdom and exploring the foundations of human understanding. This book has been praised for its clarity and the way in which Sutton takes on established and complicated topics in epistemology. It challenges readers to think deeply and to reconsider what they have come to accept as truth. Explore the intersection of Christian thought, philosophy, politics, and epistemology within this unique volume. A Bradford Book, *Without Justification* is poised to become a cornerstone of epistemological discussion for years to come. This is not just a book; it's an invitation to a philosophical revolution.